Lawrence Wolf - Part 25

Covina Police Investigate Suspected Sexual Assault of Teenage Boy

Los Angeles local ABC affiliate KABC-TV, channel 7, reported that Covina police recently arrested a 47-year-old man on suspicion of child molestation. According to the report, the man has been accused of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old boy that he met on the popular social networking site, MySpace. Supposedly, the man and teenager arranged a real life meeting with each other, and the incident of sexual assault took place at that meeting. While police continue to investigate this case, they are still looking for other possible victims that the man may have had similar interactions with.

In many sex crimes, physical evidence of wrongdoing may not necessarily be available, particularly if parties involved consented to the behavior and action in question. The news report did not mention whether or not investigators had any sort of evidence against the 47-year-old man, other than the testimony of the 14-year-old boy. Though a thorough investigation will undoubtedly reveal more details of the case, the man is innocent until proven guilty.

The social stigma associated with sex crimes can sometimes be more damaging in the long run than even the punishments handed down by a court of law. Not only will a convicted sex offender have to serve jail time, but he or she may also need to register as sex offender. Such registry can make it particularly difficult for an individual to find a place to live and secure gainful employment.

Lil Wayne Pleads Guilty to Automatic Weapon Charge

The entertainer known as Lil Wayne has pled guilty to second-degree attempted weapon possession, a felony. According to a news story, the 27-year-old rapper’s tour bus was pulled over in New York in July of 2007. Reportedly, law enforcement witnessed marijuana smoke emanating from the vehicle, and found a loaded semi-automatic weapon upon searching the bus. Reportedly, the 27-year-old is expected to receive a one-year jail sentence. He also faces charges in the state of Arizona for felony drug possession and weapons charges.

Defense attorneys on the case argue that there was no basis for searching the bus, and that more than a dozen other people were on the bus at the time it was stopped by law enforcement. Reportedly, small amounts of DNA evidence belonging to the 27-year-old were found on the weapon, which the defense argues does not belong to the rapper. Furthermore, defense counsel argues that the method in which DNA was tested for was too problematic to prove who the weapon belonged to.

Polanski May Have to Finish What the D.A. Started

According to the Los Angeles Times, film director Roman Polanski will be extradited to the United States so that he may face child-sex charges dating back to 1978. Polanksi is currently being held by Swiss officials, and is fighting the extradition. Based on correspondence sent between the two countries, extradition seems likely at this point. Reportedly, U.S. officials were tipped off by the Swiss federal office of justice that Polanski would be entering Switzerland to attend the Zurich film festival. He was then arrested as he stepped off an airplane at a Swiss airport.

In 1978, Polanski was accused of committing sexual acts with a then 13-year-old girl. Though the now grown-up 13-year-old does not wish to pursue criminal charges against Polanski, and would simply prefer it if the matter were put behind her entirely, U.S. officials have been trying to somehow get Polanski back in the country for years.

Sex charges of all kinds are a serious matter. Often times, sex offenses can be characterized by he-said, she-said accusations. Polanski’s defense attorney argues even now that improper conversations took place between the presiding judge and prosecution. In any event, it is important that all cases pertaining to sex crimes are properly handled, and that those who stand accused are given every opportunity to properly defend themselves in a court of law.

Lohan’s Legal Troubles Still Not Over

CNN.com story recently chronicled the ongoing legal troubles of actress Lindsay Lohan. According the article, a Beverly Hills judge just extended Lohan’s probation in order to give her more time to complete her court-ordered alcohol counseling treatment. To date, Lohan has reportedly not completed the program and her attendance has been less than satisfactory. While her defense attorney explained that Lohan’s career hindered Lohan from completing the program, the presiding judge warned that if she hears of Lohan missing any more meetings, she will sentence Lohan to jail time. Successful completion of the program was mandated based on a 2007 incident in which the actress ultimately plead guilty and no-contest to charges centering-around drunk driving incidents.

While the circumstances of this case are a general exception to the rule, with Lohan being afforded the right to complete the alcohol treatment at her relative leisure and around her busy schedule of acting and entertaining, not all individuals facing completion of such programs are given as much freedom in doing so. Alcohol counseling treatment is required for those individuals that are found guilty of driving while under the influence of either drugs or alcohol. After jail sentences have been served, mandatory alcohol counseling treatment must be sought out and completed at the attendee’s own expense. Successful completion of the program will then enable that individual to have a license suspension lifted after the court-ordered suspension time frame has been met.

In order for an individual to ensure that they are provided the best possible outcome in their DUI case, that individual’s best course of action is to retain the services of a skilled Los Angeles DUI defense attorney that will examine all circumstances surrounding the arrest. DUI arrests can be especially problematic in that field sobriety tests can be improperly administered and results from blood alcohol concentration tests can be inaccurate due to poorly calibrated devices used. Not all individuals that are accused of DUI are in fact guilty.

Baseball Booze and Driving Create Tragic Situations

According to a recent Los Angeles Times article, October playoff baseball may bring out the worst in some fans. That is, Orange County officials are on high alert for individuals that choose to drink during baseball games, and then proceed to operate motor vehicles soon thereafter. The high alert comes on the heels of the death of Nick Adenhart, a promising young pitcher for the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. In April 2009, the 22-year-old Adenhart and two of his friends were killed by an alleged drunk driver less than ten miles from Angel Stadium of Anaheim, where Adenhart had pitched earlier that night. In order to cut down on unnecessary traffic, the Anaheim Police Department asked all motorists not attending the Angels’ playoff game with the New York Yankees to please steer clear of the area.

While consuming alcohol at a baseball game is permitted, it is never a good idea to driving while under the influence of alcohol. An individual accused of DUI is innocent until proven guilty, which is something that the media often forgets. That is, field sobriety tests are only as accurate as the law enforcement officials that are administering them. Furthermore, breathalyzers and other devices used to determine an individual’s blood alcohol concentration need to be properly calibrated and maintained in order to ensure that test results delivered by the devices are accurate. If procedure is not followed or such devices are defective, then an individual that would otherwise be deemed innocent of driving while under the influence could be accused and arrested by law enforcement for a crime that the individual never in fact committed.

Car Part Thieves Accused of Multiple Crimes

According to ktla.com, two suspects were recently arrested and are being investigated for the theft of catalytic converters from cars and trucks in the Los Angeles area over the last several months. Supposedly, the suspects were seen by officers removing the car part from a parked car on the University of Southern California campus, and were detained for questioning and further investigation as to whether or not they are responsible for the 60-plus incidences to-date involving the stolen piece. The parts are deemed desirable amongst thieves for the precious metal they contain, creating the opportunity to easily sell such an item to metal scrap yards.

Theft crimes can be complicated, especially when multiple charges across more than one case are being sought by the prosecution. The article did not discuss what, if any, evidence law enforcement has that can positively link the two individuals to the other incidents of theft. Unless there is physical evidence of their involvement, or some sort of testimony linking the individuals to the other crimes, then the prosecution is going to be hard pressed convincing a judge and jury to convict the detained individuals of all supposed charges. In any event, it is critical that individuals accused of theft crimes retain the services of experienced legal counsel that can sort through the details of the charges and mount a strong defense on the individual’s behalf.

Gang Member Take-Down Hits LA in Raid

The Los Angeles Times recently reported that the Los Angeles Police Department and federal authorities teamed up in a raid that targeted a Los Angeles street gang responsible for crimes ranging from assault to drug charges to murder. The street gang in question calls multiple cities and areas in the Los Angeles area its home, has affiliations with prison gangs, and has a long history of committing violent acts against those whom they consider outsiders. The raid involved the detainment and arrest of a large number of individuals for a wide variety of charges. In such matters, it is important to remember that simply because an individual is grouped together with other such individuals being accused of crimes, it is not an automatic determination that all individuals are in fact guilty of said crimes.

Raids of supposed criminal organizations can be especially problematic in a court of law. That is, while some individuals may in fact be guilty of the infractions of which they are accused, other individuals may simply be innocent bystanders having been lumped together with other, more serious offenders. With drug crimes especially, the lines between guilt and innocence are often blurred, and charges are often blanketed over a group of individuals, even if all of those individuals are not in fact guilty of the alleged charges. In any event, it is vital that the services of a skilled Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer are retained in the event of your arrest.

Pot Dispensary Site of Robbery, 2 Shot

According to latimesblogs.latimes.com, a shooting occurred outside of a marijuana dispensary in West Los Angeles. Two people were seriously injured, and were taken to local area hospitals where they are in critical and serious conditions. Police investigating the matter believe that the shooting was an attempted robbery.

Los Angeles police officials cited an increase in crime levels occurring around marijuana dispensaries. Although marijuana is legal for medical purposes, the very fact that it is illegal otherwise can cause for some complicated matters pertaining to the law. Marijuana users that need the drug for medicinal purposes might be subject to investigation, particularly when instances of robbery and other crimes occur in such close proximity to the dispensaries.

For those that frequent marijuana dispensaries, it should not be assumed that they are involved in illicit behavior of any kind, and they should be afforded the same consideration and label of innocent until proven guilty that all other members of society are granted. Put bluntly, it is unfair for individuals that frequent an area to be profiled in such a manner. Concrete evidence is a requirement to directly connect an individual to a crime, and even such evidence must be qualified as being associated with the individual.

Parents Killing Children is an Alarming Trend

A recent story put out by the Associated Press tells of a startling trend pertaining to homicides involving children. In Los Angeles, a woman stands accused of killing her two daughters, ages 11 and 17. In Orange County, a 5-year-old and a 3-year-old were allegedly wounded by their mother. And in Ventura County, a 12-year-old boy and his 7-year-old sister were stabbed to death allegedly by their father. In all of these cases, the serious question as to why parents are supposedly willing to hurt their children needs to be asked, and the circumstances surrounding the slayings and injuries need to be thoroughly examined to determine what exactly happened.

The Los Angeles woman has pleaded not guilty to the charges being brought against her, and faces the death penalty if she is convicted. The woman was found with self-inflicted knife wounds on her own arms. This raises the question as to what her state of mind was at the time of the incident. Did she act with a clear head or in a fit of insanity? Other questions, such as the state of the home, also need to be answered to help paint a vivid picture of what the living situation was truly like, and what negative factors, if any, could have played a detrimental role leading up to the attacks.

DUI Driver Loses Lawyer, Case Postponed

According to Los Angeles’s KTLA-TV channel 5, the trial of a man responsible for a drunk-driving crash that took the lives of three people will be postponed for at least six months. Such a decision was determined after the private attorney defending the 22-year-old removed himself from the case, citing inability to adequately defend his client as the basis of his necessary leave. This particular case gained notoriety in that one of the crash victims was 22-year-old Nick Adenhart, a professional baseball player of the Angels. The motorist responsible for the accident now faces 54 years to life in prison if he is convicted of all counts, which include murder in the second degree and driving with a suspended license.

The former defense attorney in this case informed the presiding judge that his client was unable to afford the fees associated with providing him with the most effective defense. That is, the accused driver’s attorney explained to the judge that experts needed to properly defend the accused man were too expensive for the defendant to afford, and even motioned that county taxpayers split the bill for the necessary experts. Though the article did not say whether or not the judge granted the motion, it’s safe to assume that the motion was denied, particularly since the defense attorney has now quit the case.