Awards & Memberships

Avvo Clients’ Choice 2016
With an average rating of five stars, Lawrence Wolf is presented with the Avvo Clients’ Choice Award for 2016.
Avvo Client Reviews »

Avvo Rated 10/10 Superb Lawrence Wolf is Avvo rated 10.0/10.0 Superb. The Avvo directory uses an unbiased mathematical model to help assess a lawyer’s qualifications.
Avvo Peer Reviews »

Humanity Award
The Law Offices of Lawrence Wolf has been helping individuals for over 40+ years. Mr. Wolf has developed a reputation of working tirelessly to defend his clients. This award is given to selfless lovers of humanity.
Lawrence Wolf Bio »

The National Association of Distinguished Counsel is an organization dedicated to promoting the highest standards of legal excellence. Attorney Lawrence Wolf is a member of NADC.

Attorney Lawrence Wolf was included in the exclusive list of the “10 Best” attorneys for California for Client Satisfaction in the practice area Family Law. This rating is provided by The American Institute Of Family Law Attorneys (AIOFLA). AIOFLA is an impartial third party attorney rating service recognizing excellence of practitioners in the field.

Martindale-Hubbell Lawrence Wolf is listed on Martindale-Hubbell, a lawyer ratings service that provides an objective indicator that a lawyer has the highest ethical standards and professional ability.
View Profile Page »

Attorney Lawrence Wolf has been awarded “Top 100 Trial Lawyers” Award by the National Trial Lawyers Association. Membership into The National Trial Lawyers is by invitation only and extended to those attorneys who exemplify superior qualifications, trial results and leadership in their respective state.

Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Disclaimer: The felony, misdemeanor, traffic, criminal defense, drunk driving, DUI, theft, drugs, three strikes law, juvenile law, or other legal criminal defense information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results portrayed here were dependent on the facts of that case and the results will differ if based on different facts.